Crime, violence and extremism in Bangladesh: how to rebuild society?
14 March 2017: Insight on Conflict’s Bangladesh Local Peacebuilding Expert discusses the need for civil society and government to work together to tackle violence in Bangladesh.
Almost half of the 1.5 billion people living in fragile and conflict affected states are youth, and one can see how these realities have created a public perception of youth as either victims or perpetrators of violence. However, as the Youth Action Agenda to Prevent Violence and Promote Peace notes, “this narrative fails to capture the fact that most young people are part of the solution,” and that the majority of young people simply reject violence.
Young people are drawn to extremism because of political instability, injustice, corruption, a lack of education, socioeconomic marginalisation, and inequality. Surrounded by these issues, they feel insecure. The volatility in the system is a major reason for young people turning to violence. When they live in an unjust social hierarchy, it can motivate them to embrace crime and try and climb up the ladder to try and become the next ‘big fish’ as quickly as possible. They choose the wrong people to idolise.
As such, youth crime rates rise. Deprived of a proper education and upbringing, they are used as bait by professional criminals. Working with these children, to help them understand the value of their lives, would help build a more peaceful society.
All these issues are relevant in Bangladesh. The government is trying to realise the potential of young people in a productive manner. It will need to fundamentally rebuild society in order to do so – a daunting task.
Importantly, Bangladesh is a board member and pilot country for the Global Fund for Community Engagement and Resilience (GCERF), a global fund to support local, grassroots efforts to counter violent extremism. This has seen three programmes launched in Bangladesh.
This is a good project, but there needs to be an integrated approach and the government needs to be proactive in this, working to support local peacebuilding groups. The information such groups pull from their networks – the local streets and the environment in which they operate – means they have a map of the obstacles in the way of peacebuilding.
Through actively participating in a central process facilitated by government, local groups can and ought to play a role in shaping future peacebuilding. The government needs to support an independent authority so people from all sectors of society can input to an action plan to address all of these issues. However, nothing of this sort has happened yet. Recent events in Dhaka have brought together groups on how to adopt a ‘whole-of-system’ approach to deal with extremism in Bangladesh. There should be more of the same.
More from the blog
The killing of two people at a protest last year has launched a debate about the tactics of the police in Sierra Leone. Abdul Brima spoke to civil society and the police about how to keep the peace. Read more »