Mediation and conflict resolution in Nepal

July 31 2012: During and after 10 years of conflict, peacebuilding organisations in Nepal have worked tirelessly to promote peaceful conflict resolution through dialogue, mediation and negotiation. Ambika Pokhrel, Insight on Conflict's local correspondent for Nepal, looks at how peacebuilding has evolved in Nepal.

People who believed on the peaceful means for resolving Nepal’s conflict did not sit silently
For 10 years, between 1996-2006, Nepal was locked in an internal armed conflict. While the prospect of the stopping the violence seemed difficult, people who believed on the peaceful means for resolving conflict did not sit silently. Instead the began working toward educating and training people in dialogue, mediation and negotiation.

Promoting dialogue, mediation, and negotiation

Initially work in the field of dialogue, mediation and negotiation was limited to Kathmandu, Nepal’s capital city, where impact of conflict was minimal. Gradually some organisations began to reach outside of Kathmandu.

After conducting research on the “cost of war” and organising workshops and training on conflict resolution and peacebuilding in Kathmandu, the National Peace Campaign (NPC) began work in three conflict-prone districts – Rolpa, Salyan and Jajarkot. Rolpa was particularly notable as one of the districts where the conflict firstly began.

Participants in the programmes appreciated process and contents of the training and began to distribute what they had learnt and the training they had received. Indeed, NPC developed a training manual on conflict resolution and peacebuilding almost ten years ago and distributed it to the training participants and more widely. By working in active conflict areas, NPC gained much respect for their work.

For the last 12 years, NPC has worked resolutely to develop capacity for peaceful conflict resolution through workshops, trainings, research, and engaging in dialogue and negotiation.

Many organisations began to incorporate conflict resolution into existing programmes or develop new initiatives to address the varied impact of conflict and advocate solving the conflict through mediation and negotiation.

Supporting the ongoing peace process

After cease-fire and Comprehensive Peace Accord (CPA) in 2006 many organisations rapidly began working in the different sectors of conflict resolution.

One example is Creative International Forum (CIF) which is mediating community-level conflicts through its training participants and its informal partners. CIF has conducted regional and district level trainings on conflict resolution, peacebuilding and human rights in 30 districts in the low land of Terai and the eastern hills – an area believed to be in danger of erupting into ethnic violence.

CIF has claimed that around 100 local conflicts and disputes were solved by mediation and that a culture of mediation has been cultivated. CIF believes that regular intervention for mediation is needed to promote and strengthen this in the long term.

CIF actively collaborates with civil society and political leaders in joint efforts for resolving conflict by dialogue, mediation and negotiation, and supporting for ongoing peace process. Around 800 members from all sectors in 30 districts have been involved.

A voice for conflict victims

The victims’ agenda needs properly addressing if a sustainable peace is to be established
Nepal’s peace process has not prioritized issues of conflict victims. Instead, the peace process has been dominated by political agendas. After fall of the Constituent Assembly, the victims’ agenda has been completely overshadowed. The victims’ agenda needs properly addressing if a sustainable peace is to be established. Non-governmental organisations and civil society are tirelessly working to address victims’ agendas.

Informal Sector Service Center (INSEC), a leading human rights organization has been constantly working on the agendas of the conflict victims including the victims of the massive human rights violations occurred during conflict. INSEC published the Conflict Victims’ Profile (pdf, Nepalese) showing the total numbers of people killed, injured/handicapped and disappeared during the conflict.

All together 13,236 were killed, 1006 disappeared and 785 seriously injured or handicapped. The profile indeed allows people to find the victims’ according to political affiliation, caste, sex, occupation, marital status, language, education and district. Unless and until the grievances of the victims would not be addressed the conflict resolution and peace process remain incomplete.

Hatred, grievances and pain remain in the Nepalese society without mechanisms to address them in post-conflict reconstruction. Indeed, many conflict victims have been left out from the mainstream conflict resolution and peace process of Nepal. Not only are direct victims of the conflict are living with hatred, grievance and pain, but their families and children are also suffering. The children who were very young when their parents’ were victimized by conflict have entered into youth alone with hatred and grievances.

To address issues such as these, organisation like Youth Initiative are working with young people to empower, strengthen, promote and practice peaceful means of solving differences, civic engagement, democratization and developing collaborative efforts. These interventions cultivate a culture of peaceful conflict resolution through dialogue, mediation, negotiation where possibility of the violent conflict would minimal.

This article has touched upon the work just a four of the many peacebuilding organisations actively building peace in Nepal. For more, visit Insight on Conflict’s directory of peacebuilding organisations in Nepal.

This article is published under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA License. You are free to republish this article on your website, subject to some conditions. More information on republishing this article.

This article is published under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license. You are free to republish this article on your website, on condition that you include the following attribution:

Insight on Conflict is the leading online resource for local peacebuilding and human rights in conflict areas. This article was originally published on Insight on Conflict. The leading online resource for local peacebuilding and human rights in conflict areas.

To include this attribution, add the following html code to the bottom of the article:

<div><div class="style:both"></div><a href="http://www.insightonconflict.org"><img style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;" alt="Insight on Conflict is the leading online resource for local peacebuilding and human rights in conflict areas. " src="http://www.insightonconflict.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ioc-license.jpg" width="200" height="95" /></a>This article was <a href="http://www.insightonconflict.org/2012/07/mediation-and-conflict-resolution-in-nepal/" >originally published on Insight on Conflict</a>. The leading online resource for local peacebuilding and human rights in conflict areas.<div class="style:both"></div></div>

Comments

There is one comment Show comments

Genee on December 11, 2012

Yep, prioritization of issues is the most important thing that Nepal’s conflict lacks. Politicians do not have vision here that had cost Nepal with a bad economy, governance and unstable peace situation…I hope peace will prevail one day…V

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *