Challenges for a post-conflict Sri Lanka
Even though the armed conflict in Sri Lanka between the LTTE and the Government officially ended in May 2009, remnants of that war still clouds the island’s present. Signs of subtle yet intense militarisation inside the country as well as mounting international concern regarding human rights violations committed during the period of war testify to this. What are the challenges currently facing the country? What are the available courses of action to prevent a relapse into conflict a few years down the line?
There have been a number of views on this, expressed by different individuals. Professor Rohan Gunaratna’s is certainly a much-heard voice – locally and internationally – on the Sri Lankan conflict and the LTTE as a terrorist group. He is currently the Head of the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at Nanyang Technology University, Singapore.
As he does as the keynote speaker of the recent seminar on ‘Defeating Terrorism: Sri Lankan Experience’, hosted by the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defence, Professor Gunaratna identifies three challenges for today’s Sri Lanka in the video below:
- to develop a Tamil leadership in the North and the East;
- to improve state reputation suffering as a result of LTTE propaganda;
- to promote reconciliation and relationship building among all the groups in the country.
Professor Gunaratna flags two positive turnings after May 2009:
- the rising economy;
- the booming tourist industry.
These indeed are good beginnings. But in order for these seeds to take root and prosper, concrete actions grounded in the community itself are required in the immediate future. Justice, equality and transparency come to the fore; peace will be beyond us untill these are securely established and ensured. Increasing economic benefits in the absence of these values will only water the seeds of anger, discrimination and injustice.
The former President Chandrika Kumaratunga emphasises the significance of promoting inclusive practices that respect the diversity of each different group at the recently held Justice Palakidnar memorial oration. She observes that though the state has won the war, “it has not even begun to win the battle for peace.” For peace, a democratic and pluralist state is needed. And peace is the only way to honour the cost of blood and tears we have paid as a country – South as well as the North – for this end to war.
As a state, it is important to care about our international image: as people who have suffered more than enough from nearly a thirty-year long conflict, it is even more important to mainstream reconciliation and initiate concrete socio-political reparations that are acceptable – and indeed welcomed – by the communities at the ground level. It is necessary to go beyond talking about cohesion and a united Sri Lankan identity merely for political propaganda, and take concrete steps towards promoting a truly pluralist state. As both Professor Gunaratna and Ms. Kumaratunga notes, this is indeed a milestone for Sri Lanka. However, it still remains to be seen whether the current government will indeed choose to walk towards peace.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.2 Responses to “Challenges for a post-conflict Sri Lanka”
Achila on Oct 30th 2011
There will be no denying the recently ended ethnic conflict that devastated the entire country for more than 25 years time. Consequently, the incremental return of foreign and domestic visitors to Sri Lanka is in rapidly going up after end of the 30 years of civil war.
When it comes to geography, Sri Lanka makes remarkable landmark for ‘’Green branding’’ and it can distinguish itself from its competitors of whole Asia region. And it’s very important to revive the country’s devastated political image and country’s destination image through targeted environmental and cultural practices and promotions.
Successful establishment and rebranding process would also allow Sri Lanka to strategically and successfully position itself in the Asian travel market over the long term. Successful branding and management of world heritage sites and national parks will also open up the opportunities for Sri Lanka to restore its social and biological integrity and re-establish its geographically important sites and landscapes which badly damaged by decades of civil war,
In this manner, tourism can be a critical catalyst in overcoming the negative imagery and distrust which still impedes the Sri Lanka’s ability to achieve greater political integration and prosperity in an increasingly unfiled Asia.

eureka on Sep 19th 2011
”people who have suffered more than enough from nearly a thirty-year long conflict” is a total misunderstanding and can never bring justice and peace to all the people in this country. It’s only the armed conflict that is 30yrs: 1979-2009. But the conflict(=oppression of ethnic minorities) is 63+yrs:
http://transcurrents.com/tc/2010/08/outline_of_submission_made_to.html
Jayantha Dhanapala’s written submission to Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission(LLRC), August 2010: ‘’The lessons we have to learn go back to the past – certainly from the time that we had responsibility for our own governance on 4 February 1948 . Each and every Government which held office from 1948 till the present bear culpability for the failure to achieve good governance, national unity and a framework of peace, stability and economic development in which all ethnic, religious and other groups could live in security and equality. Our inability to manage our own internal affairs has led to foreign intervention but more seriously has led to the taking of arms by a desperate group of our citizens’’. (Dhanapala was formerly UN Under-Secretary Generak for Disarmament)
http://www.llrc.lk/images/stories/docs/August2010/LLRC-JD-Transcript.pdf
Oral submission, Jayantha Dhanapala to LLRC, 25 August 2010:’’I think we need to rectify this bad governance and the first and foremost task before us is to undertake constitutional reform in order to ensure that we have adequate devolution of power. We have already missed several opportunities in the past; we have had an APRC functioning for quite some time but its report is still languishing in obscurity and needs to be presented to the public of Sri Lanka for discussion. We need to have State reform; we need to have rule of law established; we need to ensure non discrimination amongst our citizens; we need to have – as I said before – devolution of power and a tolerance of dissent and a strengthening of democratic institutions.’’
If you know only the consequence of a problem and not the cause of the problem, how can you solve it?
The President has not yet published the reports of two commissions submitted to him in July 2009: APRC and CoI.
He kept saying in 2006-2009 that he would give maximum devolution of power once the war is over !! After the war he has been giving self-contradictory interviews and proposals of ploys. But at last he has came out with the truth:
“President: ”If I make any devolutionary concessions to the Tamils, it will be curtains for me” – Sri Lanka: Indian Delegates go Home Empty Handed, Kumar David, 15 June 2011, http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/%5Cpapers46%5Cpaper4558.html
Presidential hopefuls in the past few decades have also been saying so:
L. Athulathmudali, 4 Feb 1985: ‘’Proposing a federal constitution will be political suicide.”
R. Wickremasinghe, 13 May 1997: “We are a political party. Like any other political party, we will not do anything that will not get us into power, nor would we do anything when we are in power to lose power.”